Flow cytometric crossmatch for kidney transplantation.

نویسندگان

  • Krisada Koktathong
  • Sasijit Vejbaesya
  • Sastorn Bejrachandra
  • Kovit Pattanapanyasat
چکیده

Serum samples from 49 patients with panel reactive antibodies of greater than 15% and 17 patients who have related donor pairs were collected at the Department of Transfusion Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital. Crossmatching was performed by three methods, flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM), the standard National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the antihuman globulin (AHG) microlymphocytotoxicity. 28.9% Spell out of both T- and B-cell crossmatch was positive by FCXM and negative by NIH and AHG. When the T-cell and B-cell crossmatches were negative by FCXM, they were negative by both NIH- and AHG method. There was significant difference of the crossmatch result between FCXM and NIH and between FCXM and AHG (p < 0.0001). In addition, FCXM was about 4-16 and 8-32 times more sensitive than AHG- and NIH method, respectively. In conclusion, the result of FCXM is clear and this method is more sensitive than NIH- and AHG method FCXM should be used together with the NIH- and AHG method for kidney transplantation.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Laboratory investigations following an unexpectedly positive crossmatch result in a patient awaiting renal transplantation.

In the preparation of patients for renal transplantation tests of human leucocyte antigen (HLA) sensitisation are performed to detect "unacceptable" HLA antigens that, if present on donor cells, would be expected to result in a positive crossmatch. Individuals bearing such specificities may then be excluded from consideration as donors. Unexpected positive crossmatch results are sometimes obtai...

متن کامل

Late complications with gallbladder conduit biliary reconstruction after liver transplantation.

537 determined by correlating the recipient's serum reactivity against the T and B lymphocyte and monocyte populations as well as the use of HLA-specific monoclonal blocking antibodies. Thus, a procedure is now available for better prediction of graft survival in the recipient. The usefulness of this new procedure is particularly important in patients with high levels of sensi-tization. Investi...

متن کامل

Interpretation of positive flow cytometric crossmatch in the era of the single-antigen bead assay.

BACKGROUND Prognosis of renal transplants with positive flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM) remains controversial. METHODS We analyzed the outcome of these kidney transplant recipients by human leukocyte antigen (HLA) donor-specific antibodies (HLA-DSA) using single-antigen bead (SAB) assays in major histocompatibility complex classes I and II. We compared them with controls with a negative FCX...

متن کامل

Flow cytometric crossmatching in primary renal transplant recipients with a negative anti-human globulin enhanced cytotoxicity crossmatch.

Flow cytometric crossmatching (FCXM) and panel reactive antibody (PRA) screening techniques are more sensitive than anti-human globulin enhanced cytotoxicity (AHG-CDC) techniques at detecting anti-HLA antibodies. The clinical significance of a positive FCXM in primary renal transplant recipients with a negative AHG-CDC crossmatch is unclear. We performed retrospective FCXM and flow cytometric p...

متن کامل

Surveillance of alloantibodies after transplantation identifies the risk of chronic rejection

The monitoring of the levels of alloantibodies following transplantation might facilitate early diagnosis of chronic rejection (CR), the leading cause of renal allograft failure. Here, we used serial alloantibody surveillance to monitor patients with preoperative positive flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM). Sixty-nine of 308 renal transplant patients in our center had preoperative positive FCXM....

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet

دوره 88 6  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2005